Integrating Eudaimonia: Historical Foundations, Theoretical Frameworks, and Holistic Approaches to Wellness & Education

Kok Hwee CHIA

doi:10.64663/aet.45

Authors

Kok Hwee CHIA Merlion Paediatric Therapy Clinic, Singapore https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-2602

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64663/aet.45

Keywords:

Educational Therapy, Emotional Resilience, Eudaimonia, Existential Health, Physical Wellness

Abstract

Eudaimonia, an ancient Greek concept often translated as ‘flourishing’ or ‘well-being’, traces its roots to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, who posited it as the highest human good. The theoretical framework of eudaimonia emphasizes the fulfillment of one’s potential through virtuous living and rational activity. Integrating body and mind, physical wellness is crucial in achieving eudaimonia, as a healthy body supports a flourishing life. Psychological theories of well-being highlight the importance of mental and emotional resilience in pursuing eudaimonia, where emotional health contributes to overall life satisfaction. Eudaimonia encompasses existential and four-dimensional wellness, linking life’s meaning and purpose with spiritual and existential health, thereby fostering a holistic view of human flourishing. Interdisciplinary perspectives combine psychological approaches with philosophical insights, enriching the understanding of eudaimonia. Practical strategies for achieving eudaimonia include daily practices and habits that promote well-being, along with long-term lifestyle changes that sustain a flourishing life. Additionally, the application of eudaimonia in educational therapy for students with special needs underscores its relevance, offering tailored strategies to enhance their well-being and potential. These diverse facets demonstrate the comprehensive nature of eudaimonia as a multidimensional construct of human flourishing.

References

Ackrill, J. L. (1980). Aristotle on eudaimonia. In A. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 15-34). Oakland, CA: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340985-005

Adam, J. (Ed.). (1963). The Republic of Plato (Vol. 2): Books VI-X and indexes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897849

Allen, R. E. (2006). Plato: The Republic. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.

Annas, J. (1998). Virtue and eudaimonism. Social Philosophy and Policy, 15(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003058

Barney, R. (2010). Plato on the desire for the good. In S. Tenenbaum (Ed.), Desire, practical reason, and the good (pp. 34-64). Oxford, UK: Oxford Academics/Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382440.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382440.003.0003

Bobonich, C. (2010). Chapter 13: Socrates and eudaimonia. In D. R.Morrison (Ed.), The Cambridge companions to philosophy (pp. 293-332). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521833424.013

Brown, E. (2017). Plato's ethics and politics in The Republic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/plato-ethics-politics/. [accessed: 21 May, 2024]

Capuccino, C. (2013). Happiness and Aristotle’s definition of eudaimonia. Philosophical Topics, 41(1), 1-26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43932746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20134111

Demos, R. (1937). Plato's Idea of the Good. The Philosophical Review, 46(3), 245-275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181085

Dhiman, S. K. (2021). Being good and being happy: Eudaimonic well-being insights from Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. In Dhiman, S.K. (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of workplace well-being (pp. 3-32). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30025-8_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30025-8_1

Fowers, B. J. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025820

Fowers, B. J. (2016). Aristotle on eudaimonia: On the virtue of returning to the source. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 67-83). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_4

Frede, D., & Lee, M. K. (2003). Plato’s ethics: An overview. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/plato-ethics/. [accessed: 21 May, 2024]

Jowett, B. (Ed.). (1888). The republic of Plato. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Lawrence, G. (1993). Aristotle and the ideal life. The Philosophical Review, 102(1), 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185651

Nagel, T. (1972). Aristotle on eudaimonia. Phronesis, 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852872x00079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852872X00079

Ostenfeld, E. (1994). Aristotle on the Good Life and Quality of Life. In: Nordenfelt, L. (eds) Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care. European Studies in Philosophy of Medicine 1, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8344-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8344-2_2

Perdue, S. M. (2014, September 19). The big three of greek philosophy: Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Retrieved from: https://sites.psu.edu/rclperdue/2014/09/19/the-big-three-of-greek-philosophy-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/. [accessed: 21 May, 2024]

Rowe, C. J. (1971). The Eudemian and Nicomachean ethics: A study in the development of Aristotle’s thought. The Classical Review, 24(1), 43-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X0024170X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X0024170X

Ryan, R. M., & Martela, F. (2016). Eudaimonia as a way of living: Connecting Aristotle with self-determination theory. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 109-122). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_7

Sloan, M. C. (2010). Aristotle’s nicomachean ethics as the original locus for the septem circumstantiae. Classical Philology, 105(3), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.1086/656196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/656196

Vlastos, G. (1985). Happiness and virtue in Socrates’ moral theory. Topoi, 4(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138646

Zeyl, D. (1982). Socratic Virtue and Happiness. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 64(3), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1982.64.3.225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1982.64.3.225